lunedi` 25 novembre 2024
CHI SIAMO SUGGERIMENTI IMMAGINI RASSEGNA STAMPA RUBRICHE STORIA
I numeri telefonici delle redazioni
dei principali telegiornali italiani.
Stampa articolo
Ingrandisci articolo
Clicca su e-mail per inviare a chi vuoi la pagina che hai appena letto
Caro/a abbonato/a,
CLICCA QUI per vedere
la HOME PAGE

vai alla pagina twitter
CLICCA QUI per vedere il VIDEO

Lo dice anche il principe saudita Bin Salman: Khamenei è il nuovo Hitler


Clicca qui






 
JPost- Obama e il medio Oriente 11/11/2009
Jerusalem Post, November 8, 2009
MR. PRESIDENT, WELCOME TO THE REAL MIDDLE EAST.
Editorial, Jerusalem Post, November 8, 2009

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is scheduled to be the keynote speaker this morning
at the UJC/Jewish Federations of North America 2009 General Assembly. As Netanyahu
made his way to Washington, there were those bent on exacerbating tensions between
our premier and President Barack Obama. The Economist, for instance, taunted: "Is
Israel too strong for Barack Obama?" illustrating its story with a cartoon depicting
Netanyahu driving a bulldozer straight at the American leader.

Much was made of the fact that even as he embarked on his journey Netanyahu still
did not have a firm appointment to see the president. One US Jewish leader described
Obama as leaving Netanyahu to "twist in the wind." We do not know if ineptitude
in Netanyahu's bureau or political machinations in the White House precipitated
this unnecessary storm.

The president's schedule was anyway torn asunder in the aftermath of the terror
attack at Fort Hood, Texas. His appearance at the GA was canceled so that he could
attend a memorial service in Texas tomorrow.

Comings and goings aside, the administration has been fundamentally misreading the
situation here on the ground, allowing its own initial poor judgment to be reinforced
by unrepresentative voices in Israel and on the margins of the American Jewish community.

Thus the White House insisted on an unconditional settlement freeze everywhere over
the Green Line -- a demand with which Israel could not possibly comply. This trapped
Mahmoud Abbas in an untenable position: he could not resume talks with Israel without
appearing "softer" than Obama. When Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tried to
reverse out of this dead end, asserting the US remained opposed to all settlement
activity, but that a freeze should not be a precondition for resumption of talks,
Abbas was left aggrieved. Now he's bogged down by his own bluster and Obama's miscalculations....

Arab sources, with a little help in Europe, are now engaged in a disinformation
campaign claiming Obama is party to a "secret deal" that would see the US recognize
a new declaration of Palestinian independence and jettison Security Council Resolutions
242 and 338. In other words, rather than negotiate with Israel, the Palestinians
 are still fantasizing that Obama will impose a solution and deliver Israel on bended
knee.

Another obstacle to peace is the mendacious Goldstone Report, which poisons the
political environment. On Friday, only 17 out of 192 countries stood with the Jewish
state in the UN General Assembly as it essentially codified robbing Israel of its
practical right to self-defense. While the US did not abandon Israel, neither did
it offer overwhelming moral support. US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice did not
even attend.

Which brings us to the doors of the White House. From Eisenhower to Bush II, past
administrations have intermittently cold-shouldered Israel or sought to drive a
wedge between the Jewish state and its supporters in the United States. In this
regard, the Obama administration is breaking no new ground. Nevertheless, if Obama
buys into the insidious canard, as Thomas Friedman promotes it, that the Palestinian
leadership "wants a deal with Israel without any negotiations" while Israel's leadership
"wants negotiations with the Palestinians without any deal," he will invariably
spend the remainder of his term veering from one dead end to another.

Through a multitude of blunders -- failure to dismantle illegal outposts among them
-- successive Israeli governments have empowered the West Bank Palestinian leadership
to frame the current stalemate as resulting from Israel's preference for settlements
over peace. In reality, it is persistent Palestinian intransigence combined with
 the fragmentation of their polity that has made progress impossible.

No one wants peace more than Israel. Most Israelis support a demilitarized Palestine
living side-by-side with the Jewish state of Israel -- the very vision articulated
by Netanyahu in his seminal June 14 Bar-Ilan address. Rather than giving Netanyahu
a cold shoulder, Obama should warmly embrace this viable blueprint for peace

Condividi sui social network:



Se ritieni questa pagina importante, mandala a tutti i tuoi amici cliccando qui

www.jerusalemonline.com
SCRIVI A IC RISPONDE DEBORAH FAIT